Democracy in Iraq Free Essay

Why Did the United States Fail to Establish an Effective Democratic Government in Iraq?

Many political critics have discussed the variety of reasons for the US failure to establish democracy in Iraq. They claim Iraq has weapons of mass destruction did not find confirmation. The information that Saddam Hussein’s regime supports the Al-Qaida movement also turned out to be false. It was only after the invasion of the Americans and their allies that the Al-Qaida cells settled in Iraq. The statements of the Americans that the war in Iraq would be an “easy walk” did not correspond to reality either (Chandrasekaran 16). The statement of the brutal dictatorial nature of the regime of Saddam Hussein was true. However, this circumstance did not cause Washington concern as long as the Iraqi regime was useful to him and held back Iran’s ambitions in the region. Moreover, the paradox, the overthrow of Saddam Hussein’s regime in Iraq, helped Iran to establish itself as an influential and uncomfortable regional power for Americans and a significant supplier of oil to the markets of industrialized countries. The disintegration of the Iraqi state, which disintegrated into many zones of instability, controlled by various clans and factions that are hostile to each other, has turned the Ayatollahs Tehran regime into a real factor in Iraq’s domestic policy. The demarcation of a secular country by its religious and ethnic principle has destroyed the civil society that existed in Iraq, which could become the basis for peaceful development.

The war in Iraq has not ended, it has transformed. Now everyone is fighting against everyone. Ordinary Iraqis have to pay: seven hundred thousand civilian deaths, four million refugees, the collapse of the once highly advanced health care and education system, the collapse of the basic infrastructure, the division of the capital of Baghdad into warring areas (Chandrasekaran 21). All this complicates the prospects for the peaceful development of the country. Democracy in Iraq has been discredited both as a product imposed by arrogant invaders and by the actions of some American Iraqi henchmen.

The Iraq war has long been ingrained in everyday life of Americans. Prayer for the health of American troops in Iraq has become an indispensable part of the Sunday church service. In almost every American school, you can see a blackboard with photos of parents serving on the Iraqi front (Chandrasekaran 217).

In the US, there are already more than half a million veterans of the Iraq war. However, what has happened to the American peace movement? Does this war have no opponents? Does anyone care if the war was unleashed on the basis of contrived arguments? This kind of questions in America today can provoke fierce debate. However, for the situation in Iraq and its further development, this debate does not matter.

This is also expressed ambivalent attitude of Americans to the war. A solid two-thirds majority believes that starting a war was a mistake, but as far as the prospects for the Iraqi mission are concerned, public opinion is far from being so unequivocal. It is no accident that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama did not emphasize the demand to “bring American soldiers home,” although only a year ago the strategists of the Democratic Party planned to enter the presidential race under this very slogan (Chandrasekaran 56). Plans for the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq are overgrown with an increasing number of reservations and details.

The indecision of the White House affects public opinion. Only 21 percent of Americans consider the war in Iraq an important election topic. The mortgage crisis, stock market rush, and competition between participants in the presidential race worry Americans much more, with themes than the war in distant Iraq, to ​​which everyone is already accustomed to one degree or another.



Works Cited

Byman, Daniel L. & Pollack, Kenneth M. Democracy in Iraq? Brookings. 2003. Retrieved from

Chandrasekaran, Rajiv. Imperial Life in the Emerald City: Inside Iraq’s Green Zone. ISBN 978-1-4000-4487-0

Goldfarb, Michael. Boys in the Bubble. The New York Times. 2006. Retrieved from

Hasan, Harith. The Truth about Iraq’s Democracy. Atlantic Council. 2018. Retrieved from

The terms offer and acceptance. (2016, May 17). Retrieved from

[Accessed: October 27, 2021]

"The terms offer and acceptance.", 17 May 2016.

[Accessed: October 27, 2021] (2016) The terms offer and acceptance [Online].
Available at:

[Accessed: October 27, 2021]

"The terms offer and acceptance.", 17 May 2016

[Accessed: October 27, 2021]

"The terms offer and acceptance.", 17 May 2016

[Accessed: October 27, 2021]

"The terms offer and acceptance.", 17 May 2016

[Accessed: October 27, 2021]

"The terms offer and acceptance.", 17 May 2016

[Accessed: October 27, 2021]
Haven't found the right essay?
Get an expert to write you the one you need!

Professional writers and researchers


Sources and citation are provided


3 hour delivery