Discussion of Evidence Admission & Suppression

Some find it quite surprising that there are limits on what information is admissible when it comes to a trial. It is important that there are rules regarding this in order to protect the rights of a person. A criminal is still under the protection of the law; therefore, his or her personal rights must be protected. That is why access to such information is limited.

It is also important to make sure that guilt or innocence is determined based on the information that one obtained in compliance with the Constitution. This way the due process, guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment will be adhered as well (Sullivan, Massaro, & Riepe, 2013). Moreover, the role of the state is to restore justice, not punish and oppress people.

If there had not been any rules, the trials would be chaotic. It is crucial for the society to ensure that people feel that their life is protected from unreasonable interference from the state. The Bible says that people “lived in safety, everyone under their own vine and under their own fig tree” (1 Kings 4:25). That is why it is a common practice that other people should be restricted from knowing information about others.

Some might suggest that there must be some exceptions that will be necessary in certain cases. While some might think that this is acceptable, it is clear that this will be a violation of the Constitution. The latter protects the private lives of the people from the state and this protection cannot be limited under any circumstances (Currie, 2006).

Finally, it is worth mentioning that jurors cannot make up their own rules regarding what information can be seen admissible or not. This will violate the Due process concept and will undermine the trust to the state in general. That is why it would be beneficial to refrain from any exceptions.

References

Currie, D. P. (2006). The Constitution of the United States: A primer for the people. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Sullivan, E. T., Massaro, T. M., & Riepe, M. O. (2013). The Arc of due process in American constitutional law. New York, NY: Oxford.

The terms offer and acceptance. (2016, May 17). Retrieved from

[Accessed: March 29, 2024]

"The terms offer and acceptance." freeessays.club, 17 May 2016.

[Accessed: March 29, 2024]

freeessays.club (2016) The terms offer and acceptance [Online].
Available at:

[Accessed: March 29, 2024]

"The terms offer and acceptance." freeessays.club, 17 May 2016

[Accessed: March 29, 2024]

"The terms offer and acceptance." freeessays.club, 17 May 2016

[Accessed: March 29, 2024]

"The terms offer and acceptance." freeessays.club, 17 May 2016

[Accessed: March 29, 2024]

"The terms offer and acceptance." freeessays.club, 17 May 2016

[Accessed: March 29, 2024]
close
Haven't found the right essay?
Get an expert to write you the one you need!
print

Professional writers and researchers

quotes

Sources and citation are provided

clock

3 hour delivery

person