Inconsistent Opinions About Police Body Cameras Essay

Today, the public debate over the use of body cameras by the police grows stronger since police officers need to wear body cameras to record their work, their actions and communication with civilians. Hence, there is the public and police involved in the debate over the introduction of police body cameras. Such use of police body cameras can prevent cases of police brutality that is actually the main argument in favor of the introduction of body cameras nationwide. However, such arguments become inconsistent, when effects of police body cameras for the average civilians are taken into consideration, along with costs of the introduction of police body cameras, their possible negative effects, and doubtful benefits. Therefore, police should not be required to wear body cameras.

In practical terms body cameras may not always be helpful for civilians, while taking into consideration costs and effects of the introduction of police body cameras costs may just outweigh benefits of the introduction of police body cameras. In fact, police body cameras will be too costly for the state or federal budget, whereas their positive effects for civilians are questionable. In practical terms, the average civilian has no use of police body cameras because they do not interact with police officers on the regular basis. The majority of the population does not break the law and is not a subject to any violent action from the part of the police, in case of pursuit of suspects for instance. In other words, the overwhelming majority does not get in trouble to the extent that they will need their communication or interaction with police officers to be recorded with the help of police body cameras. At this point, it is important to place emphasis on the fact that the introduction of police body camera will occur at the public cost that means that it is American taxpayers, who, as a rule, do not intersect with police officers at all, will pay for public body cameras. The costs of body cameras will increase even more, if one takes into consideration costs of their maintenance, processing, storage and protection of the information recorded by police body cameras. In fact, costs of such innovation will be enormous in light of the equipment, software and new employees needed for the introduction of police body camera and their further maintenance.

However, the high cost of the use of police body cameras is not the only reason why they should not be implemented. In this regard, technical problems of the introduction of police body cameras are not limited to their high costs. There is also the question of the quality of video records. For example, there is no use of police body cameras, if they cannot record clearly what is going but it is virtually impossible to obtain the high quality of video records from police body cameras. In this regard, the quality of body cameras proper is secondary. Instead, what does matter is how they will be used. Police officers are not directors or cameramen of Hollywood bestsellers. They do their job. When they do their job, they are in action and often they work in conditions when they cannot see clearly what is going on around them. Therefore, body cameras may also fail to record clearly the scene. This is why, when a debatable issue emerges, there is a high risk that investigators or the court will just not see the full scene to be able to understand adequately what has really happened on a crime scene or on the place where a suspect was detained, for example. As police officers work in conditions which are not ideal for shooting, there will be little chances that video records will be really useful, even in cases of investigation of the police brutality.

Furthermore, there is a sheer legal issue that the introduction of police body cameras will arise. The problem is that video records are not always accepted by the court as admissible evidence. To put it more precisely, video records are, as a rule, not accepted by the court as admissible and valid evidence. Therefore, the major legal question that concerns police body cameras is whether the court will accept video records shot with the help of such cameras as valid and admissible evidence. If not, then the money spent on police body cameras and their maintenance will be the sheer waste of public funds which could have been spend on the enhancement of the public safety, health or education. In such a situation, the question of legal effects and acceptability of police body cameras remains open.

Finally, there is the issue of privacy and surveillance which may be conducted with the help of police body cameras. Police officers will record all the time whatever they see and wherever they are present. In such a situation, civilians, who have never committed any crime or whose behavior is not suspicious at all, will be under surveillance from the part of police officers. However, police officers have no legal authority to survey citizens without any reason.

Thus, negative effects of police body cameras make their introduction unreasonable, too costly and their positive effects questionable that means that police body cameras are not worth introducing at the moment. At least, all legal issues have to be resolved before the introduction of police body cameras, including admissibility of police video records, privacy issues, and others. 

The terms offer and acceptance. (2016, May 17). Retrieved from

[Accessed: May 24, 2022]

"The terms offer and acceptance." freeessays.club, 17 May 2016.

[Accessed: May 24, 2022]

freeessays.club (2016) The terms offer and acceptance [Online].
Available at:

[Accessed: May 24, 2022]

"The terms offer and acceptance." freeessays.club, 17 May 2016

[Accessed: May 24, 2022]

"The terms offer and acceptance." freeessays.club, 17 May 2016

[Accessed: May 24, 2022]

"The terms offer and acceptance." freeessays.club, 17 May 2016

[Accessed: May 24, 2022]

"The terms offer and acceptance." freeessays.club, 17 May 2016

[Accessed: May 24, 2022]
close
Haven't found the right essay?
Get an expert to write you the one you need!
print

Professional writers and researchers

quotes

Sources and citation are provided

clock

3 hour delivery

person