Why Brett Kavanaugh Shouldn’t Be Scotus

If you’re interested in finding reliable people to represent the nation in the court, you should know that   reputation is of great importance. You’re here because you need to have a clear understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the person who is aimed at being an Associate Justice of Scotus. You should trust this person and be aware of his abilities, skills, and experience to bring real resolutions to the emerging problems. Remember that Scotus decisions affect out life because everyone should comply with the US Constitution and laws. You’re here to acknowledge that the Scotus position assigned to a person who deserves trust of the nation is really significant. I do not want to confuse you because you’re American citizens who enjoy certain civil and human rights. You need to receive answers to the acute questions like accessibility to health care for millions people living in the States, the opportunities given to women to control their bodies, the issues like voting rights and labour rights. Some other issues that need response include how to ensure economic security and how to protect the rights of immigrants and people with disabilities. Besides, you need answers to the issues like how to increase LGBTQ equality in hiring, how to provide support for equal employment opportunity and affirmative action, and guarantee environmental protections, as well as if the judiciary can hold check on a President who makes reckless decisions about our nation’s future. Here is a problem that may affect everyone.

You should know that more than 200 national organizations that are focused on promotion and protection of the civil and human rights of Americans and more than 100 others organizations oppose the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh to be an Associate Justice of Scotus. This fact means that the candidature of Kavanaugh is not appropriate for the Scotus position.  He does not deserve to sit on the highest court of the nation. Let’s refer to Judge Kavanaugh’s reputation. He has a 12-year record on the U. S. Court of Appeals for the D. C. Circuit. You understand that he has a really huge experience in this field, but it’s not enough. He has many well-developed and widely recognized writings and speeches that make his legal career successful, but it’s not enough to be Scotus. You’d pay attention to the cases that show how Kavanaugh ruled against ordinary American citizens and the environment in favour of large, wealthy, and influential companies and corporations. He’s the one who is interested in diminishing the power of governmental agencies to help needy Americans. Also, he’s the one who believes that that the US President should avoid any civil suits and criminal investigations, although his inadequate behaviour may affect the fate of the whole nation. It becomes clear that Kavanaugh has never been a neutral, just and open minded jurist and lawyer. His conservative views do not deserve public attention and He has served as a conservative ideologue who lacks the impartiality and independence necessary to sit on the highest court in the land.

On the top of that, Kavanaugh should not be nominated to Scotus because of President Trump’s deeply biased decisions which had a negative impact on constitutionality of his own duties. The Federalist Society and Heritage Foundation are two organizations that played a critical role in promotion of the candidates like Kavanaugh. What is really important for you is to assess the weaknesses of Kavanaugh which reflect his negative attitudes toward Americans – his voting to weaken women’s control over their bodies and disrupt accessibility of health coverage for millions of Americans, as well as his negative influence on the issues which involve women, minorities, people with disabilities, and low-income Americans. There are many cases that demonstrate his antidemocratic position. For example, 

in the case SeaWorld of Fla., LLC v. Perez, Judge Kavanaugh was the one who acted as a dissenter. He did not support the majority opinion regarding a safety citation against SeaWorld. In this case, a trainer was killed by a whale, which had killed three trainers prior to that accident. In the case of National Labor Relations Board v. CNN America, Inc., he failed to protect the rights of parties involved in the collective bargaining agreement. In the case of Fogo de Chao Inc. v. Department of Homeland Security, he demonstrated hostility regarding protection of the rights of immigrants. In the case of  EME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. EPA, Kavanaugh did not support the Environmental Protection Agency’s Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, although this rule is aimed at regulating air pollution in the States. He claimed that the Environmental Protection Agency exceeded its statutory authority, although the organization did al lot to foster reduction of emissions. There are many other examples of legal cases that show you can’t trust Kavanaugh. Americans need to find a reliable person to hold the highest position in Scotus (The Leadership Conference).

Thus, I believe that Brett Kavanaugh shouldn’t be Scotus because Americans can’t trust him. His reputation isn’t good enough to address the needs of the nation. Hope that everyone’ll be wise enough to oppose his candidature to be Scotus. Here what we’d do to resolve the problem faced by Americans today. Oppose Brett Kavanaugh’s candidature to hold the highest position in Scotus in order to save our nation from degradation. President Trump’s decision to announce Kavanaugh to fill the Scotus vacancy was erroneous because he did not consider Kavanaugh’s reputation .

Works Cited

The Leadership Conference. “Oppose the Confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court of the United States”. July 17, 2018. Available from:<https://civilrights.org/oppose-confirmation-brett-kavanaugh-supreme-court-united-states/>

The terms offer and acceptance. (2016, May 17). Retrieved from

[Accessed: June 30, 2022]

"The terms offer and acceptance." freeessays.club, 17 May 2016.

[Accessed: June 30, 2022]

freeessays.club (2016) The terms offer and acceptance [Online].
Available at:

[Accessed: June 30, 2022]

"The terms offer and acceptance." freeessays.club, 17 May 2016

[Accessed: June 30, 2022]

"The terms offer and acceptance." freeessays.club, 17 May 2016

[Accessed: June 30, 2022]

"The terms offer and acceptance." freeessays.club, 17 May 2016

[Accessed: June 30, 2022]

"The terms offer and acceptance." freeessays.club, 17 May 2016

[Accessed: June 30, 2022]
close
Haven't found the right essay?
Get an expert to write you the one you need!
print

Professional writers and researchers

quotes

Sources and citation are provided

clock

3 hour delivery

person